Art Deco <erfc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:031220072025484730%erfc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 03:11:49 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
>>alt.usenet.kooks, spooge <spooge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> got double
>>secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>news:es88l31t641c69jq5up7ajtnr2j7t97d26@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 07:35:41 -0800 (PST), in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>> Natsirt <otocinc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> bloviated:
>>>>
>>>>>On Nov 24, 8:24 pm, NetMax <computeral...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> On Nov 18, 4:56 am, Marco Schwarz <marc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Hi..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Charles wrote:
>>>>>> > > I miss some of the people at TFA, but I just can't follow the
>>>>>> > > discussions there. As you say, the user interface is a
>>>>>> > > hindrance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Okay but G2 is (TFA-related) no must..!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > cu
>>>>>> > Marco
>>>>>>
>>>>>> re: Google interface, yes, different from Usenet, somewhere
>>>>>> between the forum boilerplate and Usenet. I've gotten used to it
>>>>>> (Google). It does have some useful features like files areas,
>>>>>> imbedded graphics, etc. The content & flow of the conversations
>>>>>> in TFA are very much like here though, or what here used to be
>>>>>> like. For me, that makes up for the differences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://groups.google.ca/group/The-Freshwater-Aquarium
>>>>>> It's 'moderated', but it really isn't. Other than deleting the
>>>>>> obvious **** posts and banning the posters who left them, TFA
>>>>>> still feels very Usenet, and that's not an accident and should
>>>>>> not be a surprise. TFA's organization and management (or lack of
>>>>>> ;~) is by Usenet people who liked Usenet just the way it was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyways, not trying to sell TFA on anyone. It's nice to see rafm
>>>>>> looking better.
>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>> NetMax
>>>>>
>>>>>Screw you Netmax.these groups are like they are from the likes of
>>>>>contoll freaks like you and Gill Passman and Jan and Gail and the
>>>>>holy man Ron the hipocrite preacher man..............You all
>>>>>brought this crap into the groups with your controlling and one
>>>>>sidedness attitudes...........you all seem to bring out the best in
>>>>>fokos for some reason or other.Being the total asswipes you all are
>>>>>you really need to stay the **** in the controlled groups like TFA
>>>>>and stay out of the big boys and girls area as your evidenlty not
>>>>>capable of comprehending what is what in those USENET groups.
>>>>>DUMBASS.now hold your headsideways Netmax.I swear that mouth of
>>>>>yours with that beard looks just like a vagina, but then again your
>>>>>only a ***** anyhow..........BTW tell the bitcdh Gill Passman I
>>>>>said "HI"...........all she had to do was reply to my request and
>>>>>email me and odds are this message and future ones as such would
>>>>>not ever appeared here again.Guess its ok to be holier than though
>>>>>like Gill is and some of you others huh! You all would rather *****
>>>>>and point the finger thanaccept any blame for your contribution or
>>>>>failure to be able to help at least stop what goes on by
>>>>>corresponding with the others.what is expected for dumb*****
>>>>>anyhow...........
>>>>
>>>> Could you please tone down the language and up the coherence in you
>>>> future posts. Those that may encounter you missives may actually
>>>> wish to read for comprehension. The full on frothing makes that a
>>>> slightly more difficult operation that would be the usual usenet
>>>> norm. Alternately you could post your ranting meltdowns to soc.men.
>>>> They seem to have a similar style and what can be loosely termed
>>>> English usage.
>>>>
>>>> Yer Pal In Jebus,
>>>> 'Ratz
>>>
>>>I don't care what everyone else says, you're a very kind,
>>>considerate, and helpful person.
>>
>>I was shocked by the unchristian lack of response.
>
> This post is *toxic*. You are being reproted to Skirvie and his
> minions.
Yuor account is teh toastiest, k0ok.
|
