In article
<b2forewagner-9C1388.18231528042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Bill <b2forewagner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <b2forewagner-083056.10493128042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Bill <b2forewagner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Not Good.
> >
> > NEWS ALERT
> > from The Wall Street Journal
> >
> > April 28, 2008
> >
> > The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can require voters to
produce
> > photo identification without violating
> > their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID
> > laws. In a splintered 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Indiana's strict
> > photo ID requirement, which Democrats and civil rights groups said
would
> > deter poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots. Its
backers
> > said the law was needed to deter fraud.
> >
> > For more information, see:
> > <http://wsj.com?mod=djemalertNEWS>
> >
>
> BTW Next Tuesday Primary will be effected by this decision.
>
> Conniving MF'ers
>
> Bill
Sorry, but I was glad to see this law pass. It will prevent illegal
voters. Only tax paying citizens should have the right to vote in this
country.
--
--
Peace! Om
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a *****."
-- Jack Nicholson
|
