In article <MPG.228a5e69ed8e895298981d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
phorbin <phorbin1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <740124t7vnlaoupmfpt8qqd01rimb3e7bo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Charlie says...
> > On Mon, 5 May 2008 09:07:48 -0500, phorbin <phorbin1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > >In article <3fss141v43bb1c1huvjb0ppsgv01ftl9ct@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Charlie
says...
> > >
> > >
> > >> Perhaps the old ways, old crops are best, eh?
> > >
> > >I had to think about this for a minute.
> > >
> > >My answer is an unqualified yes to the former and to the latter, a
yes
> > >to what I think you mean. That is, NA old crops are best for NA.
> >
> > Yes to the former, but now I am not sure what *you* mean, in regards
to
> > the latter. What is NA?
> >
> > Charlie, too easily cornfused
> >
> In this case North American and North America respectively.
What, back to the "Three Sisters"? That was subsistence agriculture
and we would still have to go hunting. Include South America, with
its' tomatoes and potatoes, Mediterranean herbs,
and we can talk:-)
--
Billy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KVTfcAyYGg&ref=patrick.net
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0aEo59c7zU&feature=related
|
