by enigma <enigma@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 7, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Bill <b2forewagner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:b2forewagner-18B99E.15582806072008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article
> <wildbilly-4957D0.11220306072008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .net.au>,
> Billy <wildbilly@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Getting approval to beautify public property can be
>> ***bersome, so guerrilla gardeners in cities worldwide
>> take matters into their own dirt-caked hands. . . .
>>
>> ---------
>
> IŒd say we are suffering from the lack of owner****p. All
> this work yet
> if no one steps up for communion it is all for naught. By
> this I suggest a garden where someone cares fares better
> then one where the count shows up once a month.
what i want to know is why one needs all kinds of permits to
beautify *public* property? if it's public, it's ours. we
*should* take resposibility to clean it up & care for it.
i think the problem is that we are so used to having others
take care of things for us (how many city folk know where
their garbage goes?), that we no longer know what is *ours* &
what to do with it.
lee
--
Last night while sitting in my chair
I pinged a host that wasn't there
It wasn't there again today
The host resolved to NSA.
