Re: No Till Farming

"Billy" <wildbilly@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:wildbilly-
> "FarmI" <ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 be given> wrote:
>> "Billy" <wildbilly@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > "FarmI" <ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 be given> wrote:
>> >> "Billy" <wildbilly@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:wildbilly-
>> >>
>> >>  As you will see, industrial no-till was introduced
>> >> > to combat the  erosion and loss of top soil. But industrial
no-till
>> >> > relies on expensive chemical inputs of fertilizers and increasing
>> >> > quantities of chemical remedies to combat pests (vegetative and 
>> >> > insect
>> >> > problems)
>> >>
>> >> I think your post is a bit too broad in it's scope.
>> >>
>
> You be the judge (as if it could be anyother way;-)
> This is the pertinent, last half of the article.

Thanks for that Billy.  It was interesting to read it.  They are 
interpreting No Till in quite a limited way.  Fukuoka wouldn't fit their 
definition.