Re: Global warming and your garden

In article <38OdneoWuNcCobLVnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Billy wrote:
> 
> > In article
> > <-rmdnVApjdnrnLLVnZ2dnUVZ_s7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  "Paul E. Lehmann" <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > 
> >> The thing(s) that are supposedly influencing
> >> global warming are the so called "green house
> >> gases" (GHG) which by the way act in no way
> >> like a green house and thus are incorrectly
> >> named.
> > If the idea of a greenhouse is to trap solar
> > radiation (electromagnetic radiation: EMR) in
> > order to raise its' interior temperature, then
> > that is exactly what greenhouse gases are doing.
> 
> Nope:
> 
> (The glass in a green-house prevents convection --
> obviously  CO2  does not limit convection and its
> effect on global temperature should go by a
> different name.)  Even most AGW fanatics agree
> with this.
> 
> http://xtronics.com/reference/globalwarming.htm
They are the only one. CAn you find another that uses this definition.
Google "greenhouse gases" or 'global warming".
They will give you the definition that I gave you.
> 
> 
> > Not to put too fine a point on it, their
> > covalent bonds absorb EMR in multiples of the
> > lowest bond energy. The absorbed energy is
> > converted into kinetic energy which maybe
> > linear, rotational, oscillation (Consider a
> > molecule as a series of weights held together by
> > springs. You can throw the molecule
> > [linear], the molecule will tumble [rotational],
> > [and the
> > constituent bodies will oscillate [the weights
> > will move in and out in relation to each
> > other]). The EMR has increased the movement of
> > that molecule (water va****, carbon dioxide,
> > methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, or CFCs) and that
> > is what we call heat. These molecules then passe
> > that kinetic energy on to other atmospheric
> > molecules and heat the atmosphere.
> > 
> > 
> >> The
> >> GHG are colorless.  You have a point, however,
> >> in that some scientist are thinking that the
> >> particulates may be more of a culprit than the
> >> GHG for climate change.
> > 
> > Citation please. Who says that?
-- 

Billy
Bush Behind Bars
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KVTfcAyYGg&ref=patrick.net
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0aEo59c7zU&feature=related