"Nick Maclaren" <nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:g4sokc$80d$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In article <b5ednalxLrWPQezVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Muddymike" <MikeRogers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> |>
> |> > While vacuums do work better, I doubt that the cheap ones are any
> |> > more effective than a rake, either.
> |>
> |> For these reasons I use a Billy Goat vacuum. Its big, its noisy, it
> uses a
> |> lot of petrol, and the bag is a pain to empty, but it sucks up
> everything in
> |> its path. As soon as the rain stops for long enough I shall be using
> the
> |> Billy Goat today.
>
> And it's not cheap. I never said that the large, expensive vacuums
> didn't work!
Depends what you call "not cheap" at 120 quid off Ebay it was not
expensive
either.
Mike
|
